A man who worked at two big companies, Meta and Google, shared his thoughts on which one has a better balance between work and life. He said that Meta might be more stressful but can help you grow more, while Google is more relaxed but less growing. It depends on what you want from your job. Read from source...

1. The author of the article is an ex-product manager who worked at both Meta and Google, but he does not provide any data or evidence to support his claims about work-life balance at either company. He only shares his personal opinions and experiences, which may be subjective and influenced by various factors such as team dynamics, projects, management style, etc. This makes the article unreliable and untrustworthy for readers who are looking for objective and factual information.
2. The author compares work-life balance at Meta and Google based on his perception of stress and pressure levels. He implies that Meta is more stressful and pressurized than Google, but he does not define what constitutes stress or pressure, nor does he provide any metrics or indicators to measure them. Stress and pressure can be subjective and vary from person to person, depending on their individual coping skills, expectations, goals, etc. Therefore, his comparison is vague and incomplete, and may not reflect the reality of both companies.
3. The author suggests that Meta might be a better fit for those seeking growth at the expense of stress and pressure, while Google could be a great place for those prioritizing work-life balance. This implies that working at Meta means sacrificing work-life balance in exchange for career growth, and vice versa. However, this is also a generalization and oversimplification, as both companies offer different opportunities and challenges for product managers, depending on their skills, interests, aspirations, etc. There may be cases where working at Google can lead to more career growth than working at Meta, or vice versa, depending on various factors. Therefore, his suggestion is not universally applicable, and may mislead readers into making uninformed decisions about their careers.
4. The author does not address other aspects of work-life balance, such as flexible hours, remote work options, benefits, perks, culture, diversity, etc. These are also important factors that can affect the quality of life and satisfaction of employees at both companies. By ignoring them, he provides an incomplete and partial picture of work-life balance at Meta and Google, and fails to consider the nuances and variations among different teams, departments, locations, etc.
5. The author does not provide any recommendations or advice for readers who are interested in applying for product manager roles at either company. He does not share his insights into the application process, the interview questions, the skills and competencies required, the expectations and goals of the role, etc. He also does not mention how his experience as a product manager at both companies has shaped his career development and growth, or what he has learned from working with different teams, managers, products, etc. Therefore, the article lacks practical value and usefulness for readers who