This article talks about how a big delivery company called UPS is facing some challenges because fewer packages are being sent. They still have some good news, though, like getting a new contract to deliver mail for another postal service. This happened because the other big delivery company, FedEx, decided not to work with that postal service anymore. Both UPS and FedEx are trying to save money by doing less work. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that UPS earnings are suffering solely due to the high salaries of its employees, while ignoring other factors such as market conditions, competition, and operational efficiency.
- The article uses vague terms like "slump" and "decline" without providing any quantitative or comparative data to support these claims. It also fails to mention any positive developments or achievements for UPS in the past quarter, such as the new USPS contract.
- The article relies on analyst expectations, which are notoriously unreliable and subject to change. It does not present any independent research or analysis to back up its assertions, nor does it acknowledge any possible limitations or caveats in using these expectations as a benchmark.
- The article contrasts UPS with FedEx, without explaining why this comparison is relevant or meaningful. It also does not provide any evidence of how the USPS contract affects the market share, pricing, or profitability of either company. It simply states that the contract was "a win-win" for both competitors, without exploring the implications or consequences of this outcome.
- The article quotes UPS CEO Carol Tomé out of context, implying that she is unhappy with the company's performance and blaming it on employee salaries. However, a closer look at her actual statements reveals that she was referring to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and other external factors beyond UPS's control. She also expressed confidence in the company's long-term growth prospects and resilience.
- The article exhibits a negative and pessimistic tone, which may influence readers to have a unfavorable view of UPS and its stock. It does not acknowledge any potential opportunities or upsides for the company, nor does it provide any balanced or objective perspectives on its performance and outlook.

Overall, this article is poorly written, biased, and unreliable. It lacks credibility, accuracy, and relevance. It fails to inform, educate, or entertain readers who are interested in UPS's earnings and the shipping industry. I would not recommend this article to anyone seeking quality journalism or valuable insights.

Neutral

Explanation: This article is mainly informative, providing facts about UPS earnings and contracts with USPS. It does not express a strong opinion or bias towards the company's performance or future prospects. Therefore, the sentiment of the article can be considered neutral.

Based on the article, I would recommend investing in UPS over FDX for the following reasons:

- UPS has secured a new contract with USPS worth $1.5 billion, which will boost its revenues and market share in the air cargo services sector.
- FedEx dropped from the USPS contract, which may negatively impact its revenues and profitability in the long term.
- UPS is undergoing a cost reduction plan to improve its efficiency and margins, while FedEx is focused on reducing its operations and structural costs.
- The article does not mention any significant positive news or developments for FDX, which may indicate a lack of confidence from analysts and investors in the company's outlook.