Alright, imagine you have a cool new toy truck, the Cybertruck, that you want to sell. You have two versions of it.

1. **The Special Version**: This one is super powerful and fast, but it's also more expensive because it has extra features. It usually sells for about $120,000 in your toy store (which we call "ASP" or "Average Selling Price"). You only sell this version sometimes.

2. **The Regular Version**: This one is a bit simpler and slower, but still really cool. It costs less, around $80,000. You sell many of these because they're more affordable.

Now, you want to make sure your toy store makes money (which we call "profitability"). So, you came up with a plan:

- In the summer (Q2), you sold more of the Special Versions because people were excited about them.
- But then in the fall (Q3), you realized that selling only the Special Version wouldn't make enough money for your toy store. So, you decided to also sell the Regular Version, which has a lower price but is still profitable.

Even though you're now selling more of the cheaper toys, you're still making money because you have many customers buying them. In fact, so many people bought your Cybertruck in the fall that it became the best-selling toy truck of all time!

And then, your friend said they could only afford to pay for a few months at a time (leasing), and you thought that was a great idea too! So now, they can drive their new Cybertruck home without having to pay all at once.

In simple terms, Tesla found a way to make more money by selling both the special and regular versions of the Cybertruck. And people really liked it, so they bought a lot of them! Read from source...

Based on the text provided, here are some potential criticisms and points to improve:

1. **Lack of Sourcing or Expert Opinion**: The article primarily relies on a Twitter thread by Troy Teslike for information. Including additional sources or expert opinions would make the story more robust.

2. **Use of Informal Language**: While not a deal-breaker, some sentences are written in an informal style that might be better suited to social media rather than journalism. For instance:
- "He said, he added."
- "Check out more..."

3. **Repetition**: The Cybertruck's price points (foundation series vs regular) and ASP figures are repeated multiple times, which could be consolidated into one or two sentences.

4. **No Clear Thesis/Soliloader**: While the article provides interesting facts, it doesn't have a clear thesis or argument that ties the information together. A stronger thesis would help guide the reader through the story.

5. **Minimal Context**: Given Tesla's ongoing profitability debate and Cybertruck's long-awaited release, some additional context about these topics could enhance the article's value.

6. **Sentence Fragments**: Some sentences are fragments that lack a subject or verb, making them grammatically incorrect. For example: "It appears..."

7. **Lack of Balance**: The article primarily focuses on Tesla and the Cybertruck, but a comparison with other EV trucks like Ford F-150 Lightning or Rivian R1T could provide context and balance.

8. **Use of Acronyms Without Explanation**: Acronyms like ASP (Average Selling Price), EV (Electric Vehicle), and Q3 (Third Quarter) are used without explanation, which might confuse readers who are not familiar with these terms.

To address these points, consider adding more sources, formalizing language, consolidating information, developing a clear thesis, providing context, correcting grammar, maintaining balance, and explaining acronyms.

Neutral to slightly positive.

Here's why:

1. **Positive**:
- The article reports strong sales of the Tesla Cybertruck, outperforming competitors and even some of Tesla's own models like Model S and Model X.
- It highlights that Tesla opened leasing options for the Cybertruck, making it more accessible to customers.

2. **Neutral**:
- There's no significant negative information in the article to indicate a bearish sentiment.
- The slight mention of shifting deliveries to achieve profitability is neutral as it doesn't suggest any major issues or setbacks.

There's no clear bullish or bearish stance from the content provided, hence the overall sentiment can be considered neutral to slightly positive due to the strong sales figures.