Sure, I'd be happy to explain that in simple terms!

1. **Big Changes Ahead:** Imagine you're in a big town where everyone drives cars. Now, the mayor says, "We need less pollution, so let's switch to electric cars!" That means soon, all cars in this town will run on batteries instead of gasoline.

2. **Why Switching is Hard:** But switching isn't easy. It takes time and money. Not everyone can afford a new electric car right away. Plus, we also need special places (like big vending machines) to charge these cars when they run out of power.

3. **Tesla's Plan:** Now, you know Tesla makes those cool electric cars. The CEO, Elon Musk, wants many more people to buy Tesla's not just rich people, but everyone. So, he plans to make a new car called the Model 2 (he's on models 1, 3, X, S now!), which is cheap and uses less power each day than other cars.

4. **What Happened:** Last week, Elon Musk talked about this plan in front of many people. He said they're planning to announce details about the Model 2 next year, as part of their grand project called Tesla World Expansion Day.

5. **Why People are Talking:** Many people are excited because this means electric cars could become cheaper and more common soon. But some people also worry if Tesla can really make such big changes happen. That's why they're talking a lot about it! Read from source...

Based on the text provided, here are some aspects of the article that could be seen as inconsistent, biased, or potentially employing irrational arguments and emotional behavior:

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- The article starts by mentioning "System" but doesn't provide any context about what this system is.
- There's a sudden change in topic from "System" to Tesla without any clear connection between the two.

2. **Bias**:
- The use of the term "Good" (with a capital G) in the stock overview is unusual and could be seen as positively biased.
- The mention of "Analyst ColorNewsTechChinaelectric vehiclesEVsKeyProjmobilityModel 3" all in one line without proper context suggests a possible bias towards Tesla or electric vehicles.

3. **Irrational Arguments/Emotional Behavior**:
- While not explicitly stated, the term "Good" (with a capital G) in the stock overview could imply an excessive positivity that might be considered irrational without more detailed analysis.
- The sudden mention of different topics ("Analyst ColorNewsTechChinaelectric vehiclesEVsKeyProjmobilityModel 3") without proper transitions or context can make the article seem disordered and emotionally driven rather than logically-structured.

4. **Overall Structure**:
- The article lacks a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, making it difficult to follow.
- There's no clear thesis statement or main point that the article is trying to convey.
- The repetition of "Join Now: Free!" might come off as pushy rather than informative.

To improve the article, consider providing more context, consistent transitions between topics, a clear structure, and an objective tone. Also, ensure that any positive or negative views are backed by evidence and logical reasoning.

Based on the provided article, here's the sentiment analysis:

- **Analyst Commentary**: The analyst quoted in the article ('Tesla insider tweets...') expresses a bearish sentiment.
- "Not great delivery numbers this quarter."

- **Stock Performance**: The stock price movement is not mentioned directly, but it can be implied as negative given the analyst's comment about weak delivery numbers.

- **Company News/Events**: No significant company news or events are mentioned in the provided snippet that would indicate a strong positive or negative sentiment.

Considering these points, the overall sentiment of the article appears to be **negative** or **bearish**. However, without additional context or information, it's essential to maintain a neutral bias.