Some people who have a lot of money are betting that PayPal's value will go down. They bought options that give them the right to sell PayPal shares at a certain price in the future. This is different from other people who think PayPal's value will go up and they also bought options, but these let them buy shares at a lower price than now. The first group thinks PayPal won't do well, while the second group hopes it will do better. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that there is some urgent or important information that investors need to know about PayPal Holdings's options frenzy. However, the article does not provide any concrete evidence or analysis of what exactly constitutes an "options frenzy" or why it matters for the company or its shareholders.
2. The article relies heavily on vague terms such as "whales", "bearish stance", and "options history". These terms are not defined or explained in any detail, which makes it hard for readers to understand what they actually mean or how they affect PayPal Holdings's performance or prospects.
3. The article contradicts itself by stating that 35% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations, but then claiming that whales with a lot of money have taken a bearish stance. This inconsistency undermines the credibility and objectivity of the article, as it suggests that the author is either unaware or careless about the facts and data they present.
4. The article does not provide any context or background information about PayPal Holdings's business model, market position, competitive advantage, or recent developments. This makes it difficult for readers to assess the relevance and significance of the options activity mentioned in the article, as well as the potential impact on the company's future performance and profitability.
5. The article lacks any original research or analysis, and instead relies on secondary sources such as Benzinga Insights, which is not a reputable or authoritative source of financial information. This implies that the author has not done their due diligence or conducted a thorough investigation into the topic, but rather copied and pasted from other websites without verifying or cross-referencing the data or claims made by them.