A Bitcoin ETF is a way to invest in Bitcoin without actually owning it. People want this because it's easier and safer. But the people who decide if we can have one, called the SEC, haven't said yes yet. Some people think they will soon and others are worried about delays or rejection. This article talks about how people feel and what might happen next. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It suggests that the spot bitcoin ETF approval is imminent or inevitable, but the article does not provide any solid evidence or official statement to support this claim. Instead, it relies on vague and unreliable sources such as "a crypto Vlogger" and "price action".
- The article is poorly structured and organized. It jumps from one topic to another without clear transitions or connections. For example, it starts with the SEC's denial of Grayscale's ETF application, then switches to Cramer's negative comments on crypto, then mentions some price movements, then ends with a disclaimer that Benzinga does not provide investment advice.
- The article is biased and one-sided. It only presents the positive views and expectations of some pro-bitcoin advocates, while ignoring or downplaying the negative aspects and risks associated with bitcoin and crypto in general. For example, it does not mention any of the potential regulatory hurdles, security issues, market manipulation, volatility, etc. that could affect the spot bitcoin ETF approval process and performance.
- The article is emotional and speculative. It appeals to the readers' feelings and hopes, rather than providing factual and objective information. It uses words like "heats up", "we have heard nothing", "expect multiple approvals", etc. that create a sense of urgency and excitement, but also uncertainty and doubt.
- The article is not informative or educational. It does not provide any useful or actionable insights into the spot bitcoin ETF debate, its history, its implications, its pros and cons, etc. It only provides some superficial and outdated data (e.g., the price of bitcoin over 24 hours and 7 days), some anecdotal and unverified quotes (e.g., from a crypto Vlogger), and some irrelevant and filler content (e.g., the inverse Jim Cramer story, the popular channels section).