Apple is a big company that makes iPhones and other stuff. The government (DOJ) wants to check what they are doing, but some smaller companies are not getting attention. This article talks about three of those smaller companies that people might want to invest in because they could grow bigger and make more money. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) is facing some serious legal troubles from the DOJ, but not these three other names. However, the article does not provide any evidence or details about the nature of the scrutiny or how it affects Apple's business or reputation.
2. The article relies heavily on analyst ratings and price targets from Canaccord Genuity Group Inc., which is an over-the-counter stock that may not have credibility or authority in the eyes of the readers. The article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or affiliations between the author and the analyst firm, nor does it provide any analysis or validation of their methods or track record.
3. The article uses price-to-book (P/B) valuation as a metric to compare Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) with the industry average, but without explaining what P/B means, how it is calculated, or why it is relevant for evaluating the company's performance or prospects. The article also ignores other important factors such as revenue growth, profitability, cash flow, dividends, etc., that may influence investors' decisions.
4. The article does not provide any context or background information about the companies mentioned in the article, such as Apple, Salesforce, Canaccord Genuity Group Inc., or CME Group. This makes it hard for readers to understand their business models, markets, competitive advantages, risks, opportunities, etc.
5. The article ends with a promotional message for Benzinga's services and products, which is inappropriate and unprofessional. It also implies that the author has a vested interest in persuading readers to sign up for Benzinga or buy their reports, which may affect their objectivity and credibility.

To generate comprehensive investment recommendations, I would need to analyze the following factors for each of the three under the radar names mentioned in the article: market capitalization, revenue growth, profitability, valuation, dividend yield, earnings per share, price-to-earning ratio, price-to-book ratio, and price performance. I would also need to consider the risks associated with each investment, such as industry trends, competition, regulatory scrutiny, legal issues, geopolitical risks, macroeconomic factors, and company-specific news.

Based on my analysis, here are some possible investment recommendations and risks for each of the three under the radar names:

Apple (AAPL):