Two people who work at big companies sold some of their own shares in those companies because they think the price is too high and might go down. One person worked at a company that makes parts for phones, and another person worked at a company that makes cans. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that insiders are selling these stocks because they know something negative or positive will happen in the future, which is not necessarily true. Insider sales can be due to various reasons, such as personal financial needs, diversification strategies, tax planning, etc. The article should have used a more neutral title, such as "Recent Notable Insider Sales In These 4 Stocks".
2. The introduction of the article contains an irrelevant quote from Benzinga that does not add any value or insight to the reader. It seems like an attempt to justify the insider sales by citing external sources, but without providing any evidence or reasoning behind their claims. The quote also contradicts itself by saying that insider sales should not be taken as the only indicator for making an investment or trading decision, and then suggesting that it can lend conviction to a selling decision.
3. The section on Qualcomm is poorly written and contains several errors and inconsistencies. For example, it says that Dell unveiled PCs with Qualcomm Snapdragon chips, but then does not explain how this relates to the insider sale or the performance of the stock. It also states that Qualcomm develops and licenses wireless technology and designs chips for smartphones, which is a very basic and vague description that does not capture the essence of the company's business model or its competitive advantage. Additionally, it mentions the premarket coverage without any context or relevance to the insider sale.
4. The section on American Express is missing completely, which shows a lack of thoroughness and professionalism from the author. It also leaves the reader with unanswered questions about why an executive sold his shares and what impact this might have on the company's performance or prospects. A more comprehensive analysis would have included information on the size, timing, and reason for the sale, as well as the executive's holding period, historical trading activity, and relationship with the company.
5. The section on Ball Corporation is incomplete and confusing, as it only covers one director's sale while ignoring other insiders who may have also sold shares. It also fails to provide any context or explanation for why the director sold his shares or how this relates to the company's earnings report. Furthermore, it does not mention any other factors that might affect the stock price, such as market trends, industry dynamics, analyst ratings, etc. A more balanced and objective article would have discussed both the positive and negative aspects of the insider sale and how they might impact the investment thesis.