A group of hackers from Russia, who work for their government, attacked two big companies called Microsoft and HPE. They got into their computers and looked at some emails. This happened before with another company too. These hackers are hard to stop because they are very smart and have a lot of resources. Microsoft and HPE said the attacks did not cause any major problems for them, but it still shows that these hackers can be AIgerous. Read from source...

- The title is misleading as it suggests a direct link between HPE and Microsoft being targeted by the same Russian hacking group. However, the text only mentions that both companies were breached by the same group, not necessarily at the same time or for the same reason.
- The article lacks evidence to support the claim that the cyber-attacks did not significantly impact their operations. How can we trust the statements of the companies involved when they have a vested interest in downplaying the severity of the breaches? What are the potential consequences of the breaches for their customers, partners, shareholders, or competitors?
- The article relies heavily on unnamed sources and opinions from Crowdstrike's CEO to provide context for the cyber threats. Why does it not cite any official reports, expert analyses, or data from the affected companies or other credible sources? How can we verify the accuracy and objectivity of the information presented in the article?
- The article ends with a vague statement about how the cyber-attack could potentially impact the ongoing acquisition talks between HPE and Juniper Networks. What are the specific details or rumors that support this speculation? How does the author know about these talks and their status? Why is this information relevant to the main topic of the article?