A long time ago, a man named Jensen Huang tried to tell someone about his idea for a new company. He did not do a good job and the person was not interested. But another friend of that person liked the idea and gave money to help start the company called Nvidia. The company made special computer parts called GPUs that are really good at making video games, then helping people make digital money, and now helping computers think and learn like humans. Because of this, the company is very big and valuable today. Read from source...

- The title is sensationalized and misleading. It implies that Jensen Huang's initial pitch was one of the worst ever made, which is an exaggeration and a subjective judgment. A better title could be "Jensen Huang's Early Nvidia Pitch Was Not Well Received, But He Overcame It And Became A Tech Titan".
- The article relies too much on the perspective of one person, Chris Corrigan, who was not even a co-founder or an investor at the time of Huang's pitch. His opinion is not representative of the whole industry or the potential market for Nvidia's products. A more balanced approach would include other sources and viewpoints, such as Huang himself, his co-founders, other investors, customers, competitors, analysts, etc.
- The article focuses too much on the negative aspects of Huang's pitch, such as his lack of preparation, nervousness, and poor delivery. It does not acknowledge or explore the positive aspects, such as his vision, passion, creativity, resilience, learning, and adaptation. These are important qualities that contributed to his success and leadership in the tech industry.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms, such as "great", "horrible", "undisputed leader", "exploding popularity", without providing any concrete evidence or data to support them. It also makes predictions about Nvidia's future that are based on assumptions and speculations, rather than facts and trends. A more objective and factual tone would be more appropriate for a business article.
- The article includes irrelevant information, such as the mention of OpenAI's ChatGPT, which is not directly related to Nvidia or Huang's pitch. It also uses outdated or incorrect terminology, such as "crypto crash" instead of "bitcoin crash", and "Bizcast podcast" instead of "Sequoia Capital". A more careful and accurate editing would improve the quality and credibility of the article.

Positive

Key points from the article:
1. Jensen Huang's initial pitch for Nvidia was deemed one of the worst by his former boss, yet he still managed to secure funding and build a successful company.
2. Nvidia has made multiple pivots in its business model, from gamers to cryptocurrency mining to AI, which has helped it become the third most valuable listed company in the world.
3. Huang emphasizes the importance of having a good past and character in business, rather than just being able to pitch well or have high intelligence.