Three important things happened recently with some big companies. People who watch the stock market think these companies will do something that might change their value. One of them is called Donaldson, another one is Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and there are three more. Read from source...

1. The author does not provide any data or evidence to support the claim that U.S. stock futures are trading lower this morning on Tuesday, and how that affects the performance of these three stocks. This is a weak opening statement that lacks credibility and objectivity.
2. The use of Wall Street as a source of authority is questionable, since it implies a consensus opinion among market participants, but does not specify who or what they expect from Donaldson Company. Moreover, the author does not explain how this expectation impacts the stock price or the investment decision. This is an ambiguous and vague statement that leaves readers unsure of the relevance and accuracy of the information.
3. The author fails to mention any other factors or events that may influence the stock performance of Donaldson, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and 3 Stocks To Watch Heading Into Tuesday. This is a major oversight that ignores potential market dynamics and externalities that may affect the investment outlook. The article seems to be based on arbitrary and superficial observations, rather than thorough and comprehensive analysis.
4. The author does not provide any personal opinions or perspectives on these stocks, nor does he indicate whether he has any position in them. This is a missing element that prevents the reader from understanding the motivation and credibility of the writer. Without knowing the author's stance, it is hard to assess the quality and reliability of his arguments.
5. The author uses a misleading and exaggerated headline that does not reflect the content or scope of the article. The title implies that there are three other stocks to watch besides Donaldson and Hewlett Packard Enterprise, but the article only mentions them in passing without any details or explanations. This is a deceptive and misleading tactic that violates journalistic ethics and standards.
6. The author does not provide any sources or citations for his information, which makes it difficult to verify or corroborate his claims. This is a serious flaw that undermines the credibility and trustworthiness of the writer. Without proper attribution, the reader cannot judge the accuracy or reliability of the data or evidence presented in the article.