So, Uber is a company that helps people get rides in cars. They had a special meeting where they talked about their plans for the future and how well they are doing. After this meeting, some people who watch companies (called analysts) said that Uber is doing really good and will keep growing. They also think Uber's value (price) will go up in the next year. Because of this, more people want to buy Uber's shares (little pieces of the company), so the price went up too. One person who has money invested in Uber even called it a "fire-breathing dragon", which means they think it is very strong and successful. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Uber's investor day was a major event that led to a significant increase in its price target, but it doesn't provide any context or comparison with other similar events or companies. A more accurate and informative title would be something like "Wedbush Analysts Increase Uber Price Target by 9% After Investor Day".
2. The article focuses too much on the positive aspects of Uber's performance and outlook, while ignoring or downplaying any potential challenges, risks, or criticisms that the company may face in the future. For example, it doesn't mention anything about the recent lawsuit filed by Google's Waymo against Uber for alleged self-driving car technology theft, which could have a significant impact on the company's reputation and valuation.
3. The article cites Wedbush analysts as the main source of positive feedback for Uber, without disclosing any potential conflicts of interest or incentives that they may have to be bullish on the stock. For instance, Wedbush is a member of the Wall Street firm league and receives research payments from companies it covers, which could create a bias towards generating positive coverage and recommendations for Uber.
4. The article quotes Ross Gerber, an Uber investor, who uses hyperbolic language to describe the company's growth potential ("fire-breathing dragon"). This suggests that he may be emotionally invested in Uber's success and may not be objective or rational in his assessment of the stock. Additionally, Gerber's quote does not provide any specific or credible evidence to support his claim about Uber's dominance or market share.