A company called Fisker that makes electric cars had money problems and couldn't pay its bills. So, it decided to file for bankruptcy, which means it will try to find a way to fix its money issues or close down. This happened before with other car companies that make electric cars too. Elon Musk, the boss of another electric car company called Tesla, said that most car companies go out of business because it's hard to make good cars and sell them at a price people are willing to pay. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Fisker is joining Lordstown and Arrival in bankruptcy, but it actually filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, not liquidation. This distinction is important because Chapter 11 allows a company to restructure its debts and continue operations under new ownership or management, while liquidation means selling off assets and ceasing business activities.
- The article uses vague terms like "troubled" and "uncertain" to describe Fisker's financial situation without providing any concrete evidence or numbers. It also fails to mention that Fisker had secured a $1 billion credit facility from General Motors Co in April, which could potentially help the company overcome its cash crunch and avoid bankruptcy.
- The article relies on quotes from Elon Musk, who has a history of making controversial and provocative statements about his competitors and rivals. His remark that "the default state of a car company is dead" is not only arrogant and dismissive, but also factually inaccurate, as many car companies have survived and thrived for decades without going bankrupt or merging with other entities.
- The article presents Fisker's production numbers and delivery performance as a sign of failure and weakness, without acknowledging the challenges and risks involved in launching a new EV brand in a highly competitive market. It also ignores the positive feedback and reviews that Fisker has received from customers and critics for its innovative design, sustainability features, and user experience.
- The article ends with a list of other struggling EV startups, such as Rivian, Lucid, Arrival, Lordstown, and Volta Trucks, implying that they are all doomed to fail or follow Fisker's path, without considering the diversity and potential of each company. It also fails to mention the support and partnerships that some of these startups have secured from major automakers, investors, or governments, which could help them overcome their current difficulties and achieve long-term success.

Negative

Explanation: The article discusses Fisker's bankruptcy filing and the challenges faced by EV startups in general. It also mentions Elon Musk's comment on the default state of a car company being dead, implying that many car companies go out of business or struggle to survive. This indicates a negative sentiment towards the auto industry, especially for EV startups.

One possible way to approach this task is to first summarize the main points of the article and then identify some key factors that may affect the performance or viability of the electric vehicle (EV) startups mentioned. Next, I can compare and contrast the different EV companies based on these factors and provide a brief overview of their respective strengths and weaknesses. Finally, I can make some suggestions on which EV company might be a good investment opportunity or a potential candidate for bankruptcy in the future, based on my analysis and judgment.