A smart person who works with internet stuff thinks that the web might not change or improve much in the next 35 years. He compares it to when people were making planes better, but then they stopped for a while. Read from source...

- The article is based on a single opinion of one tech executive, who has no evidence or data to support his claim that web innovation will plateau in the next 35 years. It seems like he is just expressing his personal doubts and fears about the future of the internet, rather than presenting a factual analysis.
- The article compares the current state of the web to the aerospace industry in the 1960s, which is a very simplistic and inaccurate comparison. The aerospace industry was facing many technical and political challenges at that time, such as the Cold War, the space race, the lack of standardization, the high costs and risks of experimentation, etc. The web, on the other hand, is not facing any of these issues, and has been constantly evolving and improving in terms of technology, accessibility, usability, security, etc.
- The article uses emotional language and phrases such as "wildly disappointing", "might be", "heading for a period of stagnation", which imply a negative and pessimistic tone. This could influence the readers' perceptions and expectations of the future of the web, and make them feel hopeless or disillusioned about the potential of innovation.
- The article does not provide any counterarguments or alternative perspectives from other experts, researchers, entrepreneurs, investors, etc., who might have a different view on the future of the web. It only presents one side of the story, which could be biased, incomplete, or inaccurate.
- The article does not address any of the current trends, challenges, opportunities, or breakthroughs that are happening in the field of web innovation, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, quantum computing, cloud computing, internet of things, etc. It seems like the author is ignoring or dismissing the possible implications and impacts of these developments on the future of the web.
- The article does not provide any facts, figures, statistics, or examples to support its claims or arguments. It relies mainly on anecdotes, opinions, and speculations, which are not very convincing or reliable.