Alright, imagine you're playing with your piggy bank. You have some money in there, and so do your friends.

Now, let's say one of your friend's moms (like a rich person or big company) comes along and buys something special and rare with all her money. This special thing is like Bitcoin - it's shiny, valuable, and not many people can have it.

When she buys it, the price of this special thing goes up, up, and up! It becomes even more expensive than before. Now, buying one of these special things costs almost as much as a big, fancy house!

You and your other friends who didn't get one might feel sad because you don't have enough money to buy it now. You can only watch from the side while the mom's friend shows off her shiny new thing.

That's what Mr. Kiyosaki is trying to explain. He thinks that if Bitcoin becomes really, really expensive, only very rich people and big companies will be able to buy more of it. This could make some people feel left behind or poorer compared to others who already have lots of Bitcoin.

And just like how he advised people to save their money in the past, he now says that maybe we should put our money into special things like Bitcoin, gold, and silver instead of keeping it just as cash - especially if you want to get rich someday! Read from source...

**Critiquing the Article: Inconsistencies, Biases, Irrational Arguments, and Emotional Behavior**

1. **Inconsistencies**:
- The opening statement asserts that Bitcoin could create a wealth gap but then immediately quotes Robert Kiyosaki as saying "the poor and middle class can still catch up" when Bitcoin breaks $100,000. This is inconsistent with the initial statement's implication that catching up would be impossible.
- Kiyosaki criticizes saving traditional currencies but later mentions that he owns them (dollars, pesos, yen, etc.) in his portfolio.

2. **Biases**:
- The article heavily relies on a single source, Robert Kiyosaki, to present its arguments without adequately exploring opposing viewpoints or providing balanced reporting.
- The article focuses solely on the wealth disparity that Bitcoin's rise could cause, ignoring potential benefits of cryptocurrencies like financial inclusion and borderless transactions.

3. **Irrational Arguments**:
- Kiyosaki's statement that "savers are losers" is an oversimplification and generalization. Savings rates, time horizons, and risk tolerances vary among individuals.
- The claim that only the ultra-rich, corporations, banks, and sovereign wealth funds could afford meaningful amounts of Bitcoin once it surpasses $100,000 is speculative and disregards the possibility of mass adoption or affordable entry points through other cryptocurrencies.

4. **Emotional Behavior**:
- The article's headline ("The Rich Will Get Richer") and the included tweet (ending with "Wishing has never made poor people richer") lean towards fear-mongering and creating a sense of panic or envy, rather than informing readers about the complexities of wealth disparity and bitcoin.
- Kiyosaki's phrase "it will be almost impossible for the poor and middle class to catch up" could stir anxiety among readers unaware that catching up doesn't necessarily mean becoming millionaires overnight.

**Rational Discussions Absent**:
- The article lacks a discussion on how individuals can start investing in Bitcoin at lower entry points or through other means, such as dollar-cost averaging.
- It doesn't explore counterarguments, like how Bitcoin's decentralization could potentially decrease wealth disparity by offering opportunities for diversification and financial inclusion beyond traditional financial systems.
- The article fails to provide historical context on wealth gaps, suggesting that crypto is a sole driver of inequality, when in reality, it's a complex issue influenced by numerous socio-economic factors.

The sentiment of the article is predominantly **negative** and **bearish**. Here are a few reasons why:

1. **Wealth Gap Warning**: The core message of the article revolves around Robert Kiyosaki's prediction that Bitcoin's rise above $100,000 will exacerbate wealth inequality. He suggests that only the ultra-rich, corporations, and institutions will be able to afford significant amounts of Bitcoin, leaving middle-class and poor individuals further behind.

2. **Criticism of Traditional Currencies**: Kiyosaki emphasizes the importance of investing in Bitcoin, gold, and silver over saving traditional currencies like dollars or euros. This implies a negative sentiment towards fiat currencies.

3. **Concerns about Mainstream Acceptance**: Despite Bitcoin's increasing mainstream acceptance, Kiyosaki highlights the growing concerns about wealth inequality that come with it. This suggests a bearish tone regarding the potential societal impacts of digital currencies.

4. **No Counterarguments**: While Kiyosaki's views are presented without direct challenge or counterargument in this article, real-world responses to his claims might offer more balanced perspectives.

5. **Emphasis on Education and Action**: The article underscores the importance of financial education and investment strategies to navigate evolving financial landscapes. However, it also presents a somewhat grim outlook for those not engaged in certain types of investing, contributing to its negative sentiment.

Overall, while the article discusses Bitcoin's potential value increase, its focus is on the wealth gap that could be exacerbated as a result, casting a bearish and negative tone over the discussion.