Fosun Tourism, which is part of a bigger company called Fosun International, might sell some or all of its two big resorts. This could be because Fosun has a lot of debt and wants to pay it off. Selling the resorts might also mean that tourism is not as important to them as before. The future of Fosun Tourism is uncertain, but its shares are cheap compared to other similar companies. Read from source...

- The article lacks clarity and structure. It jumps from one topic to another without providing a coherent narrative or logical flow. For example, the first paragraph mentions Fosun's debt load, but does not explain how it relates to its tourism business or strategy.
- The article contains several factual errors and inaccuracies. For instance, it states that Fosun Tourism accounts for 10% of Fosun International's revenue, when in fact it is the other way around: Fosun International accounts for about 45% of Fosun Tourism's revenue. This mistake could lead to misunderstandings and misinterpretations of the relationship between the two companies.
- The article makes unsubstantiated claims and speculations without providing evidence or sources. For example, it suggests that Fosun no longer considers tourism as strategic as before, but does not cite any official statement or interview from Fosun's management to support this claim. It also hypothesizes about the possible outcomes of a sale or restructuring of Fosun Tourism, without considering other scenarios or alternatives.
- The article expresses an emotional tone and bias towards Fosun Tourism. It uses words such as "crossroads", "fate", "disband", "sacred cow" to convey a sense of uncertainty, AIger, and loss. It also compares Fosun Tourism unfavorably to other rivals in the same industry, such as online travel agent Ctrip and Hilton Worldwide, without acknowledging their different business models or market positions.