Elon Musk, the boss of Tesla, wants to make cars that can drive by themselves without people controlling them. He is working on a special system called FSD that helps the car do this. Some people want the cars to do more things, like move out of the way for faster cars or break some rules at stop signs. But Elon Musk says they have to be very careful because there are rules and safety people who don't want them to break the law. Tesla is still trying to make FSD better so that it can drive smoothly and safely without people having to control it all the time. They need to follow some steps before they can let their cars drive by themselves on the roads. Read from source...

- The title is misleading as it suggests that Musk prioritizes safety over convenience, but in reality, he only prioritizes safety when it comes to FSD features. He does not care about safety in other aspects of Tesla's business or operations.
- Pullara's post on X is based on his personal preferences and assumptions, not on empirical evidence or data. He assumes that other drivers do the same things as him, but he does not provide any proof or survey results to support his claims. He also suggests features that would make Tesla's cars more aggressive and reckless on the road, which could increase the risk of accidents and damage to property.
- Musk's response shows that he is not concerned about NHTSA's opinion or regulations, as he admits that some of the features Pullara suggested are technically illegal. He also uses a weak analogy with the doctor example, which does not justify his decision to prioritize FSD features over smoothness and reliability.
- The article fails to mention any challenges or drawbacks of scaling FSD, such as technical limitations, ethical dilemmas, social implications, or public acceptance. It also ignores the fact that Tesla's current FSD software requires active driver supervision and cannot operate without human intervention.
- The article quotes Elluswamy's statement about regulatory hurdles being minimal if sufficient data proves the safety advantages of autonomous cars, but it does not provide any evidence or data to support this claim. It also implies that other autonomous car companies are helping Tesla clear the regulatory path, which is vague and unsubstantiated.
- The article ends with a vague statement about why it matters, without explaining what the benefits or impacts of FSD are for consumers, society, or the environment. It also does not address any potential risks or drawbacks of autonomous vehicles.

Neutral

Key points:
- The article discusses Tesla's FSD software and Elon Musk's responses to questions about its features and challenges.
- Musk prioritizes safety over convenience for the FSD software and acknowledges that some legal aspects might be difficult for NHTSA.
- Tesla is working on improving the FSD software and aims for vehicle autonomy, but it still requires human supervision.
- Regulatory hurdles are minimal if sufficient data shows safety advantages of autonomous cars over human-driven ones.

Summary:
The article reports on Elon Musk's views on Tesla's FSD software and its potential features and challenges. He says that safety is the main priority for the software, even if it means not adhering to some legal norms. He also explains that Tesla is working on improving the FSD software to enable vehicle autonomy, but it still requires human intervention. The article suggests that regulatory approval might be easier if the data shows that autonomous cars are safer than human-driven ones.