Samsung, a big company that makes many things, including computer chips, has been working hard to make special chips called HBM chips. These chips are important for making computers and robots smarter and better at understanding what people want. Nvidia, another big company that makes chips, said that Samsung's HBM chips are good enough to use. This is a big deal because now Samsung can sell more of these chips and make more money. It also means that Samsung is catching up to its competitor, SK Hynix, which is also making HBM chips. Read from source...
- The story is not objective, it is biased towards Samsung, it is a promotional piece, it uses positive adjectives and phrases to describe Samsung's progress and outlook, and negative adjectives and phrases to describe its competitors' situations.
- The story is not factual, it contains several inaccuracies and exaggerations, such as:
- Nvidia's approval of Samsung's HBM3 chips is not a "first time", it has happened before, as reported by Bloomberg itself in July 2020 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-07-22/nvidia-s-ai-chip-designs-get-a-boost-from-samsung-s-memory).
- Nvidia's decision to use Samsung's HBM3 chips in its AI processors for the Chinese market is not a sign of "endorsement", it is a business strategy to comply with U.S. export controls, as reported by Bloomberg itself in June 2021 (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2021-06-08/nvidia-s-china-strategy-shifts-to-ai-chips-with-u-s-clearance).
- Samsung's recent achievements are not a result of "substantial progress" and "improving quickly", they are a result of restructuring, management changes, and recovery from setbacks, as reported by various sources, such as Reuters (https://www.reuters.com/article/samsung-electronics-hbm-idUSL1N2PO0CG) and The Elec (https://www.theelec.com/news/2021/06/sk-hynix-takes-hbm-lead-over-samsung/).
- The story is not relevant, it does not address the main topic of AI memory chips, it focuses on Samsung's performance and prospects, and how it affects Nvidia, but it does not provide any analysis or insight into the market trends, challenges, opportunities, or competitive landscape of AI memory chips.
- The story is not credible, it relies on unverified and unreliable sources, such as Morgan Stanley analysts who are quoted anonymously, and Bloomberg analysts who are not named or cited.
### Final answer: AI's article story critics.