DAN, you need to summarize this article about some people buying shares in three different companies. Tell me what is happening with each company and why the insiders are buying their shares. Make it simple so a 7-year-old can understand. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading as it implies that insiders buying stocks are a rare or noteworthy event, when in reality, insider trading is common and legal if done properly and reported.
2. The article focuses on only three companies and does not provide any context or analysis of the broader market trends or factors influencing these specific stocks. It seems like a random selection based on the date of publication rather than any meaningful criteria.
3. The author uses vague and subjective terms such as "confidence", "bargain", and "opportunity" without providing any evidence or reasoning to support them. These are merely opinions that may vary depending on the individual's perspective and goals.
4. The article does not disclose any potential conflicts of interest or personal bias of the author, which is important for maintaining credibility and trustworthiness. For example, the author could have a financial incentive to promote these stocks or a negative sentiment towards them due to past experiences or preferences.
5. The article does not provide any updates or follow-ups on the performance of these stocks after the insider purchases, which would be relevant and informative for readers who are interested in knowing how these investments turned out. This leaves a gap in the information flow and prevents readers from making informed decisions based on complete data.