Viper Energy announced that they are selling more of their shares to the public. This means people can buy a small part of Viper Energy's company. Diamondback Energy, another company, is helping Viper Energy with this sale by offering some of its own shares too. Some big banks like J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs are also involved in making sure everything goes smoothly. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and does not reflect the content of the article. It implies that Viper Energy is offering a new product or service, when in fact they are just selling existing shares to investors. A more accurate title would be "Viper Energy Sells Shares to Investors: Pricing and Details".
2. The article contains irrelevant information, such as the names of the joint book-running managers and co-managers for the secondary offering. This information does not add any value or insight for the reader, and only serves to clutter the text.
3. The article lacks a clear structure and organization. It jumps from one topic to another without providing a coherent narrative or logical flow. A better approach would be to start with an introduction that summarizes the main points of the article, followed by a detailed description of the secondary offering, and then a conclusion that wraps up the key takeaways for the reader.
4. The article uses vague and ambiguous language, such as "up to an additional 1,725,000 shares". This phrase does not convey a precise number or quantity, and leaves the reader wondering how many shares are actually being offered. A more precise statement would be "Viper Energy is offering 1,725,000 shares of Class A common stock, with an option to sell up to 15% of them as over-allotment options".
5. The article does not provide any analysis or evaluation of the secondary offering, such as why Viper Energy is selling shares, what the implications are for their business and financials, or how this compares to similar transactions in the industry. This leaves the reader with unanswered questions and a lack of understanding of the context and significance of the event.
6. The article ends abruptly without any conclusion or summary of the main points. It leaves the reader wondering what the purpose of the article was, and whether they learned anything new or useful from it. A better way to end the article would be to reiterate the key facts and figures of the secondary offering, and provide a brief commentary on its relevance and impact for Viper Energy and their stakeholders.