Alright, imagine you have a lemonade stand. Here's what happened to Microchip Lemonade Stand:

1. **They didn't sell as many lemons as expected**: The number of lemons they sold was less than what people thought they would sell. This is called "Revenue Surprise" in fancy business talk.

2. **Their profit per lemon was also not great**: So, not only did they sell fewer lemons, but they also made less money on each lemon they did sell. This is like if you were charging only one cent for your delicious lemonade! This is called "EPS Surprise".

3. **People get upset because they expected more from them**: Because Microchip Lemonade Stand didn't do as well as people thought they would, their stock (like little stamps that represent ownership of the stand) went down in price.

So, just like how you'd want to buy some extra lemons and change your pricing if you saw this happening at your stand, investors might think about buying or selling Microchip's stocks because of these unexpected results. That's why their stock price is going down right now.

In simple terms: Microchip Lemonade Stand didn't do as well as peoples expected, so people are selling their little stamps (stocks), which makes the price go down. Read from source...

Based on the provided text from System (Benzinga), here are some aspects that might be critiqued by AI:

1. **Spin or Bias**: The language used in the headline "why it's moving" can give an impression of neutrality, but the content of the article seems to focus more on one side (negative) of the stock movement without providing a balanced view.

2. **Vague Language**: The phrase "movers" is used repeatedly, but it's not clear what specific criteria were used to determine which stocks are considered "movers".

3. **Emotional Appeal**: The use of colors in the charts and the dramatic language like "tanked" in the headline could evoke an emotional response from readers rather than presenting facts objectively.

4. **Lack of Context**: While the article mentions earnings, it doesn't provide context such as how the company has been performing overall or what analysts were expecting, which would help readers understand why the stock price moved as it did.

5. **Clickbait vs Insightful Analysis**: The headline and layout could be seen as clickbait rather than providing in-depth analysis or insight into why these stocks moved.

6. **Repetition of Information**: The article repeats information already provided elsewhere, such as the company's name, ticker symbol, and stock price performance, which could be seen as unnecessary padding to meet a certain word count.

7. **Lack of Counterarguments**: While the article presents negative news for these stocks, it doesn't discuss any potential positive news or arguments that might counter the bearish sentiment.

8. **Inconsistency in Coverage**: If you were to look at other articles on Benzinga, you might find a lack of consistency in which stocks are covered and how they are presented, leading to questions about their editorial process or selection bias.

Based on the content of the article, here's a breakdown of its sentiment:

1. **Negative**: The article discusses that Microchip Technology Inc missed analysts' earnings expectations and reported lower-than-expected revenue.
2. **Bearish**: It mentions that shares of the company fell by around 7.68% after these disappointing results.

So, overall, the sentiment of this article is negative and bearish about Microchip Technology Inc.