once upon a time, there was a man named jeffrey piccolo who was very sad because his wife passed away from a bad allergic reaction. he thought disney, the big company with lots of fun things, should be blamed for it. so, he and his lawyer decided to sue disney. sue means they want to take disney to court and let the judge decide if disney did something wrong.
disney said "no, we can't go to court because of a special rule. when people sign up to use disney's streaming service called disney+, they agree to solve any problems through a process called arbitration. arbitration means that instead of a judge and a courtroom, there's a special person called an arbitrator who listens to both sides and decides what's fair.
disney said jeffrey piccolo agreed to use arbitration when he signed up for disney+, so they don't have to go to court. but jeffrey's lawyer thinks that's not fair, and they're asking the judge to let them go to court anyway. the judge will listen to both sides and decide what to do next.
Read from source...
1. The arbitration clause is unclear and its application to this specific case is dubious. It appears to be an attempt by Disney to avoid responsibility.
2. The plaintiff's attorney pointed out the absurdity of forcing a subscriber to arbitration for all disputes indefinitely, even if the dispute is not related to the streaming service. This suggests a lack of foresight and reason on Disney's part.
3. Disney's argument that they do not own or operate the Irish pub in question does not excuse them from their responsibility in providing a safe and allergen-free environment. The pub was in Disney Springs, which is under their control.
4. Disney's motion to dismiss the lawsuit seems like an attempt to dodge the blame and consequences of their negligence.
5. The wording of the subscriber agreement seems misleading and could potentially harm consumers. There needs to be clearer communication of the terms and conditions of using the service.
6. The overall tone of the article seems to favor Disney and downplay the severity of the incident. This could lead to further mistrust of the company and their handling of such matters.