Elon Musk is a famous person who has a social media platform called X. This platform uses people's messages and posts to teach a computer program named Grok how to talk like humans. But some people in the European Union are not happy about this because they think Elon Musk did not ask for their permission to use their messages. Now, they are complaining to the authorities who make sure people follow the rules in the European Union. Read from source...

- The story is written from a third-person perspective, but the author is affiliated with Benzinga, which creates a potential conflict of interest and bias.
- The story uses sensationalist language, such as "alleged", "faces", "backlash", "sparking", "alleged", "facing", etc., to create a negative tone and imply guilt without evidence.
- The story relies on a single source, TechCrunch, which is not a reputable or authoritative source on the subject of X or EU data privacy laws.
- The story does not provide any evidence or details of how X used the data of EU users to train AI models without their consent, or how this violates GDPR.
- The story does not mention any possible motivations or benefits for X to use the data in this way, nor any potential drawbacks or risks for not doing so.
- The story does not mention any possible counterarguments or alternative perspectives from X or other experts in the field of AI, data privacy, or EU law.
- The story does not provide any context or background information on X, its platform, its chatbot Grok, or its founder Elon Musk, which would help readers understand the situation better.
- The story does not provide any information on the status or outcome of the complaints filed with the data protection authorities in the EU, or the legal action taken by the Irish DPC, which would help readers assess the credibility and validity of the claims.
- The story does not provide any information on the potential impact or consequences of the allegations on X, its platform, its chatbot, its AI research, its users, or its investors, which would help readers evaluate the significance and relevance of the issue.

### Final answer: Poor. The story is poorly written, biased, unsupported, and incomplete. It does not meet the standards of accuracy, objectivity, and fairness expected of a news article. It does not provide enough information or context for readers to form their own opinions or make informed decisions. It does not serve the public interest or the purpose of journalism.