Hey there, little buddy! I'm going to tell you what happened in the world of money and business today. Some places where people trade things made more money, some made less, and some stayed about the same. In Asia, most places went up a bit, but Europe didn't do so well. The price of oil and gold changed too, but not by much. People are still watching what will happen next in the world of money. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and does not reflect the actual content of the article. The focus should be on global markets performance rather than specific regions or commodities. A more accurate title would be "Mixed Performance Across Global Markets as Crude Hovers Around $80 and Gold Stays at $2,100".
2. The introduction is too long and contains unnecessary details that do not add value to the reader. For example, mentioning "While Us Was Sleeping" implies a U.S.-centric perspective and ignores the importance of Asian markets in the global context. A shorter and more informative introduction would be: "Global markets show mixed results today as crude oil prices remain around $80 per barrel and gold continues to trade at $2,100 per ounce."
3. The article is organized by region rather than market sector or industry, which makes it difficult for the reader to follow the main trends and themes. A more logical structure would be to group markets by their performance in different sectors, such as energy, technology, healthcare, etc., and then compare them across regions.
4. The article uses vague and subjective terms like "soared", "declined", "gained", etc. without providing any context or benchmarks for comparison. For example, what does it mean that the Nikkei share average soared to a record high? How does this compare to its historical performance or other indices? A more objective and data-driven approach would be to use numerical indicators like percentage changes, index points, etc., and provide relevant references for comparison.
5. The article includes irrelevant and outdated information that does not contribute to the main topic of global markets. For example, mentioning U.K.'s FTSE 100 traded lower by 0.50% is unnecessary since it does not relate to crude oil or gold prices, nor does it reflect any significant trend in the European market. A better practice would be to focus only on information that is directly relevant and up-to-date to the main topic of the article.
6. The article ends abruptly without a conclusion or summary of the key points. This leaves the reader unsatisfied and confused about the purpose and message of the article. A possible way to improve this would be to provide a brief overview of the main findings and implications of the global market performance, such as how it affects investors, consumers, or businesses across different sectors and regions.