This article talks about how different things people can buy with their money made them more or less money last year. It compares three things: Bitcoin, which is a type of digital money; Shiba Inu, another type of digital money but smaller than Bitcoin; and Super Micro, which is a company that makes computer parts. The article wants to know which one would have made people more money if they bought $1000 worth of each last year. It also talks about why some people are willing to take bigger risks with their money now compared to before. Read from source...

- The author seems to have a strong bias towards cryptocurrency and AI, as they use terms like "cryptocurrency bull market run" and "alternative coins" without providing any evidence or analysis of their performance or potential. This makes the article sound more like an opinion piece than a factual report.
- The author also uses emotional language to describe the market trends, such as "accelerated", "paused", "reaccelerated", and "boosted". These words imply a sense of excitement and urgency, which may appeal to some readers who are looking for quick profits or thrilling investment opportunities, but they also lack any substance or objectivity.
- The author does not provide any clear comparison between Bitcoin, Shiba Inu, and Super Micro in terms of their returns, risks, volatility, or other relevant factors. They only mention that the cryptocurrency market has been performing well, but they do not explain how each asset class contributes to this performance or why one would choose one over another.
- The author does not address any potential drawbacks or challenges of investing in cryptocurrency or AI, such as regulatory uncertainties, security issues, technical difficulties, ethical concerns, or environmental impacts. These are important aspects that investors should consider before making any decisions, and the article fails to provide any insights or guidance on these matters.