Oracle is a big company that makes computer software and hardware. They had good results in the last three months, so their shares went up by about 13%. This means people think Oracle is doing well and want to buy more of its stocks. Some other companies' stocks also moved up or down before the market opens today because of different reasons. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Oracle shares are trading higher by around 13%, but in reality, they only jumped 13.4% in pre-market trading, which is not the same as trading higher. Additionally, it implies a causal relationship between Oracle's earnings report and the stock price movement, which may not be true or supported by evidence.
- The article lacks depth and analysis of the factors that contributed to Oracle's earnings beat or miss. It only mentions the revenue and earnings per share figures, but does not provide any context, comparison, or explanation for how they relate to the market expectations, industry trends, or competitive advantages. Moreover, it does not mention any guidance or outlook for the future performance of the company, which could be relevant for investors and traders.
- The article focuses too much on other stocks moving in pre-market trading, which are irrelevant to Oracle's situation. It lists several stocks that have no connection to Oracle, except for being featured in Benzinga's premarket movers section. This could confuse or distract the readers from the main topic of the article, which is supposed to be about Oracle and its earnings report. Additionally, it does not provide any reason or rationale for why these stocks are moving, other than their percentage change in price, which could be due to many factors unrelated to their fundamentals or prospects.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous language throughout the text, such as "some", "other", "also", "after", etc. These words do not convey any specificity or clarity about what they are referring to or why they are relevant. For example, it says that Oracle's revenue increased 7% year-over-year, but does not say by how much or from what base figure. It also says that the company reported better-than-expected earnings, but does not specify what was the expectation or by whom. It also uses "after" to imply a causal relationship between events that may not be logical or supported by evidence, such as Marpai's shares trading higher after reporting preliminary Q4 net revenue results and announcing an off-cycle new client agreement.
- The article ends with a copyright notice and disclaimer from Benzinga, which does not add any value or information to the readers. It also implies that the author of the article is not responsible for the accuracy or quality of the content, which could undermine his credibility and authority as a writer. Additionally, it does not provide any source or citation for the data or quotes used in the article, which could violate ethical standards or plagiarism rules.