Alright, imagine you have a big lemonade stand (that's Rumble), and you're doing quite well, but you want to make even more lemonade and maybe add some new fun flavors!

1. **Tether wants to help your lemonade stand**: Tether is like a nice neighbor who has lots of money and believes in your lemonade stand because they love lemonade too! They really want to buy some of your lemons (shares) to support you.

2. **Tether buys some of your lemons**: The neighbor says, "I'll give you $0.75 for each lemon you sell me!" You agree, and together you sell 100 lemons. So, Tether gives you $75! But wait, you decide to use $25 to buy more sugar (to invest in your stand), and you use the other $50 to pay back some friends who loaned you money earlier.

3. **You also have a special offer for your loyal customers**: You tell all your customers, "If you bring me one of my own lemons back, I'll give you $0.75 for it too!" This way, some people can sell their lemons back to you if they want some extra pocket money.

So, in simple terms, Tether is helping Rumble (the lemonade stand) grow by buying some of its shares and giving it more money, while also allowing some stockholders to cash out if they choose. Read from source...

I've reviewed the provided text from Benzinga.com and here are some potential areas for criticism or points that could be made by a critic:

1. **Lack of Context and Background:**
- Critics might argue that the article assumes readers have prior knowledge about Rumble and its ties to free speech advocacy, cryptocurrency, and decentralization. Background information on these topics would help contextualize the investment.

2. **Potential Conflict of Interest:**
- Some critics might question if Benzinga has any financial or business relationships with either Rumble or Tether that could create a conflict of interest in its reporting on this story.

3. **Use of Quotes:**
- Critics might note that the article relies heavily on quotes from Rumble's CEO, Chris Pavlovski, and Tether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino. More independent analysis or external expert commentary would balance these views and provide a more comprehensive perspective.
- Additionally, some critics might argue that these quotes are rather PR-esque in their language ("excited about this collaboration," "shared values") and lack substantial insights into the strategic thinking behind the investment.

4. **Assumption of Altruism:**
- Critics could question the assumption that Tether's investment is solely driven by shared values, as the company also stands to benefit financially from its $775 million investment.

5. **Stock Price Focus:**
- Some critics might argue that focusing on after-hours stock price increases glosses over other essential factors for investors to consider, such as long-term strategic value and market prospects.
- Critics could also question if the 50.7% increase in RUM's stock price is sustainable or a knee-jerk reaction to the news.

6. **Lack of Critiques or Risks:**
- The article is mostly positive in tone, and critics might argue that it would benefit from presenting counterarguments, risks, or challenges associated with this investment and the companies involved.

7. **Clickbait Headline:**
- Some critics might view the headline "Rumble Stock Soars After Tether's $775M Investment" as overly sensationalistic, ignoring other aspects of the story that could have been emphasized (e.g., shared values, free speech advocacy, cryptocurrency connections).

Based on the content of the article, the sentiment is **bullish** and **positive**. Here's why:

1. **Positive Developments**:
- Rumble is receiving a significant investment of $775 million from Tether.
- The company will use $250 million to support growth initiatives.
- There's an upcoming self-tender offer for shareholders.
- Both the CEO of Rumble and Tether expressed excitement about the collaboration.

2. **Price Action**:
- Shares are up 50.7% in after-hours trading, indicating strong investor confidence.

3. **No Negative Aspects**:
- The article does not mention any significant challenges or negative news related to Rumble or its recent developments.