Some people at Microsoft made a computer program called Copilot that helps people with their work. It can do things like writing emails or making slides for presentations. But some people who tried it say it doesn't always understand what they want it to do. They think it needs more practice to get better at helping people. Read from source...

- Critics of Microsoft's AI assistants say they are not a "pixie dust" to sprinkle and make lives easier
- They struggle with understanding context and handling commands involving multiple apps
- They have drawn mixed reviews from early adopters, some of whom have invested in the technology despite its limitations
- Microsoft remains confident about the Copilots' potential and is working on enhancing their features
- Analysts predict widespread adoption and significant financial impact for Microsoft may not occur until the first half of 2025

Some possible improvements for the article are:

- Use more specific examples of how the AI assistants fail to meet expectations or create problems for users
- Provide more data or quotes from analysts or experts to support the claims and predictions
- Explain more clearly how Microsoft's AI strategy aligns with its overall business goals and competitive position in the market
- Discuss more potential benefits or challenges of integrating AI across different product lines and customer segments
- Compare and contrast Microsoft's AI assistants with similar or competing products from other tech giants or startups

Neutral
Article's Content: Microsoft's AI assistant, Copilot, is under scrutiny as early adopters say AI is not "pixie dust" to sprinkle and make lives easier. The software has mixed reviews, as it excels at automating tasks and generating text and images but struggles with understanding context and handling commands involving multiple apps. Microsoft remains confident in Copilot's potential, but analysts predict widespread adoption may not occur until H1 2025.