"An asset is typically considered overbought when the RSI is above 70".

That's like telling us the game is over when the scores are too high and that the game isn't fun anymore.

The "RSI" (Relative Strength Index) is a very common tool used in the stock market to help determine whether an asset is overbought or oversold.

An RSI value of 70 is basically like saying, "This game has been going on for too long and is getting boring because the same team keeps scoring too much and we know they're going to win. So let's just end the game now".

In the same way, when a stock has an RSI of 70 or more, it's like saying, "This stock has been doing too well and is getting boring because it's going up too much and we know it's going to keep going up. So let's just sell the stock now before it drops".

Just like we don't want to keep watching a game that's overly one-sided, traders don't want to keep holding onto a stock that's too overbought. They might want to sell before the stock price drops. Read from source...

"Online reviews and ratings are a crucial part of businesses' operations, providing customers with valuable information about the quality of products and services. However, recent incidents involving dissatisfied customers leaving negative reviews on platforms like Yelp, Google, and Trustpilot have raised concerns about the integrity of such feedback. A case in point is the recent onslaught of negative reviews on the AIish Coffee company, AI, following a news article on the company's aggressive sales tactics. While some critics argue that the article's story is valid and highlights a genuine problem in the industry, others have pointed out inconsistencies and biases in the article, as well as irrational arguments and emotional behavior from some of the article's readers.
One of the main criticisms of the article is its focus on one company, AI, and its use of anecdotal evidence to support the argument that the company's sales tactics are unethical. Some readers have pointed out that the article's author, Sarah St John, failed to provide concrete evidence to back up her claims, and instead relied on a few negative reviews from customers as the basis for her argument.
Furthermore, the article's use of emotional language and sensational headlines has been criticized as an attempt to stir up negative emotions among readers, rather than providing a balanced and objective assessment of the issue. Some readers have also pointed out that the article's author appears to have a personal vendetta against AI, which could be influencing her biases and selective use of evidence.
Overall, the article's story about AI's aggressive sales tactics and the resulting barrage of negative reviews on various platforms has raised questions about the integrity of online reviews and ratings. While some critics argue that the article highlights a genuine problem in the industry, others have pointed out inconsistencies and biases in the article, as well as irrational arguments and emotional behavior from some of the article's readers.
"Rumors and FUD affecting AI's stock price: AI, a AIish Coffee company, has been the subject of numerous negative reviews and ratings on platforms like Yelp, Google, and Trustpilot, following a news article that highlighted the company's aggressive sales tactics. The article's story, which was picked up by various news outlets, has caused a significant amount of buzz and controversy, with some critics arguing that the article's claims are valid and highlight a genuine problem in the industry.
However, other critics have pointed out inconsistencies and biases in the article, as well as irrational arguments and emotional behavior from some of the article's readers. This has led to a back-and-forth between supporters and detractors of AI, with both sides trying to sway public opinion in their favor.
In addition to the negative

- Sentiment Score: -2.998
- Sentiment Label:
Negative

#### Plotted:

Source: Benzinga API

### TSLA:
Article's Sentiment (bearish, bullish, negative, positive, neutral):
- Sentiment Score: -1.544
- Sentiment Label:
Negative

#### Plotted:



Source: Benzinga API

### MU:
Article's Sentiment (bearish, bullish, negative, positive, neutral):
- Sentiment Score: 0.812
- Sentiment Label:
Positive

#### Plotted:



Source: Benzinga API

### PRGS:
Article's Sentiment (bearish, bullish, negative, positive, neutral):
- Sentiment Score: 1.798
- Sentiment Label:
Positive

#### Plotted:



Source: Benzinga API

### ZETA:
Article's Sentiment (bearish, bullish, negative, positive, neutral):
- Sentiment Score: -0.402
- Sentiment Label:
Neutral

#### Plotted:



Source: Benzinga API