The article is about how people are not interested in buying or selling digital pictures of Donald Trump anymore, so their value has gone down a lot. This happened because he might get in trouble with the law soon and people don't want to support him. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the decline in trading volume is directly related to the criminal trial, which may not be the case. A more accurate title would be "Trading Volume of Original Trump NFT Collection Plummets 99% in Past 30 Days: Is There a Connection to the Criminal Trial?"

2. The article does not provide any context or background information about the original NFT collection, such as its launch date, initial price, or sales numbers. This makes it difficult for readers to understand the significance of the decline in trading volume.

3. The article relies heavily on data from OpenSea, which is a single source and may not be representative of the entire NFT market. Additionally, the lack of transactions in the past week could be due to technical issues or other factors unrelated to the criminal trial.

4. The article does not explore possible reasons for the decline in interest in the original collection, such as competition from newer NFT collections featuring other celebrities or political figures, changes in consumer preferences, or external events that may have negatively impacted Trump's reputation.

5. The article uses terms like "glorified" and "cartoonish" to describe the images featured in the NFT collection, which suggests a negative bias against Trump and his supporters. This could influence readers' perception of the product and its value.