A big boss named Sam Altman talks about a problem with another big boss named Elon Musk. They used to work together but then they disagreed on some things and stopped working together. Now, Elon is saying that the company he left did something wrong, but Sam says they didn't do anything wrong. People are interested in what happened because it involves smart computer programs that can help people with many things. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading, as it implies that the OpenAI CEO has broken his silence on Musk's lawsuit, when in fact he only made a brief statement that does not reveal much about his true thoughts or intentions.
- The article uses quotations from the OpenAI CEO without providing enough context or background information to help readers understand the situation and the motives of both parties involved. For example, it does not explain why Musk chose to part ways with OpenAI, what was his proposal for Tesla's acquisition, or how he defines "deviating from its original mission".
- The article also relies on secondary sources, such as documents submitted to the court and statements made by OpenAI in response to Musk's allegations, without verifying their accuracy or credibility. For example, it cites a document that claims Musk has "conjured" a fictional founding agreement, but does not provide any evidence or reasoning for this claim.
- The article seems to favor OpenAI's perspective over Musk's, as it emphasizes the importance of open-source technology and putting powerful AI tools in the hands of people for free, while downplaying Musk's concerns about the company's non-profit status and its partnership with Microsoft.
- The article does not explore the possible implications or consequences of the lawsuit for either party, nor does it offer any analysis or insights into the broader issues of AI ethics, governance, and accountability that are raised by this conflict.

Neutral
Explanation: The article presents a balanced view of the lawsuit between OpenAI and Elon Musk, giving both sides of the story without explicitly taking a stance or showing bias. Therefore, the sentiment is neutral.