A famous iPhone hacker named George Hotz said he will not use Apple's phone again because he does not like their App Store. He is upset with how Apple treats developers and makes them pay a lot of money to put their apps on the App Store. Apple also changed how some web apps work for people in Europe, making them less useful. Many other big tech leaders have criticized Apple for these actions too. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the famous iPhone hacker, George Hotz, has some personal vendetta against Apple or its devices, which may not be true. A more accurate and neutral title could be "Famous iPhone Hacker Criticizes Apple's App Store Policies".
- The article does not provide any evidence or sources to support the claims made by Hotz or the author. For example, it is unclear how much revenue Apple earns from its App Store or how much developers have to pay for alternative payment methods. It also does not mention any specific examples of apps that were affected by Apple's changes for EU users or how they hindered their functionality.
- The article uses emotive language and ad hominem attacks to discredit Apple and its decisions. For instance, it calls Apple "a bunch of clowns" and describes its App Store as a "tantrum". It also implies that Apple is acting unfairly or unethically by citing security concerns, without considering the potential benefits or risks of allowing sideloading of apps or alternative payment methods.
- The article does not acknowledge any possible counterarguments or alternatives to Apple's App Store policies. For example, it does not consider how Apple's approach may enhance user safety, privacy, and convenience by providing a curated and secure platform for app distribution and transactions. It also does not compare Apple's policies with those of other platforms, such as Google Play or the Microsoft Store, to see if they offer more flexibility or choice to developers and users.
- The article seems to have a negative bias against Apple and its products, which may influence its credibility and objectivity. It also appears to be influenced by Hotz's personal preferences or opinions, rather than factual or logical arguments. For example, it mentions that Hotz is famous for his PlayStation 3 hack, but does not explain how that relates to his stance on Apple's App Store policies.
- The article ends with a list of sources and references, but many of them are outdated, irrelevant, or unreliable. For example, it cites a Bloomberg article from 2019 about Spotify's dispute with Apple, which is not directly related to the current issue. It also cites a tweet from Mark Zuckerberg as a source, which may not be trustworthy or authoritative.

### Final answer: AI thinks that the article is poorly written and biased against Apple, and does not provide any solid evidence or reasoning to support its claims. AI suggests that readers should be more critical and skeptical of such articles, and seek out other sources and perspectives before forming their own opinions.

Negative
Explanation: The article portrays Apple in a negative light, criticizing its App Store policies and actions taken to hinder progressive web apps for EU users. It also mentions several prominent tech figures who have criticized Apple's practices.