This article talks about how people are investing more money in companies that grow fast and use technology, instead of companies that don't grow as much. The article says that this has happened because people believe in the power of technology and new ideas to make businesses better. Some big companies like Apple are doing very well and making more money than other companies that don't grow as fast. Read from source...

- The article starts with a misleading headline that exaggerates the impact of tech and AI on growth ETFs inflows. While it is true that technology and artificial intelligence have driven significant flows into these funds, the claim that they "drive" $12.2 billion inflows is an overstatement, as there are many other factors that influence investment decisions.
- The article also makes a vague and unsupported assertion that growth ETFs have marked a record outperformance over value stocks. While it is true that growth stocks have generally outperformed value stocks in recent months, the article does not provide any evidence or data to back up this claim, nor does it explain what constitutes "record" outperformance or how it is measured.
- The article then goes on to list some of the top-performing growth ETFs and their returns in June, without providing any context or comparison with other asset classes or market indices. For example, it mentions that Apple (AAPL) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) have rallied by 15% and 8.8%, respectively, but does not mention how these returns compare to the overall market or other sectors. It also does not explain what factors contributed to these gains, such as earnings surprises, positive analyst revisions, or sector rotation.
- The article concludes with a sentence that seems to imply a causal relationship between growth ETFs and tech stocks, without providing any supporting evidence or analysis. It states that "This surge in interest towards growth-linked funds coincided with a significant outperformance of growth over value stocks", but does not explain why this is the case, or how strong is the correlation between these two variables.

Overall, the article seems to suffer from several flaws and shortcomings, such as lack of rigor, clarity, and objectivity in its arguments, data presentation, and interpretation. It also appears to have a biased and optimistic tone towards growth ETFs and tech stocks, which may not be justified by the current market conditions or historical performance. Therefore, I would advise readers to approach this article with caution and skepticism, and seek additional sources of information and analysis before making any investment decisions.