Yellen is the person who helps decide how much money people need to pay for things they buy. She says that prices of those things are going down and will keep going down in the future. Some people are worried because prices went up a lot last month, but Yellen thinks it's okay and we should focus on what happens over a long time. Read from source...

1. The headline is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that Yellen is addressing the recent market volatility caused by inflation data, but in reality, she is focusing on the long-term trend of inflation. A more accurate headline would be "Yellen Discusses Long-Term Inflation Trends and Market Reactions".
2. The article does not provide any context or background information about Yellen's speech or the Detroit Economic Club event. It assumes that the reader is already familiar with these details, which may confuse or alienate some readers who are not familiar with this topic. A brief introduction or summary of the event would be helpful for readers to understand the significance and relevance of Yellen's remarks.
3. The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "rattles markets" and "strong". These words do not convey any specific meaning or analysis, but rather invoke emotional reactions from the reader. A more objective and precise language would be to describe the market movements in terms of percentage changes, sectors affected, and possible factors influencing them.
4. The article does not provide any evidence or data to support Yellen's claim that inflation is moving decisively down. It simply cites her statement without analyzing it or comparing it with other sources of information, such as economic indicators, surveys, expert opinions, etc. A balanced and critical report would include a discussion of the pros and cons of Yellen's argument, as well as the potential challenges and risks that may affect the inflation outlook.
5. The article ends with an unrelated promotion for Benzinga's services and products, which is inappropriate and irrelevant for a news report. It detracts from the credibility and professionalism of the article, and may also violate journalistic ethics or standards. A better way to conclude the article would be to provide some insights or implications of Yellen's speech, or to invite reader feedback or comments on the topic.