OpenAI is an AI company that made a big new invention, but some people who used to work there had to sign papers saying they wouldn't say bad things about the company. Now, OpenAI feels sorry and changed their mind. They don't want anyone to lose their share of the company for speaking up. This happened after they showed off a cool new AI invention that can talk, see, and listen. Some people were not happy with how OpenAI was doing things. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist, as it implies that OpenAI reverses course on non-disparagement terms for all former staff, which is not true. They only changed the policy for a majority of them, leaving some exceptions. This creates confusion and skews the reader's perception of the situation.
2. The article does not provide any context or background information about why OpenAI introduced non-disparagement terms in the first place, nor how they affected the employees who signed them. This makes it difficult for the reader to understand the motives and consequences of this policy change.
3. The article quotes an OpenAI spokesperson who apologizes for changing the language now, but does not explain what led to this decision or how it aligns with their values and goals as a company. This leaves a gap in the narrative and raises questions about the credibility and transparency of the source.
4. The article mentions several events that have put OpenAI under the spotlight, such as the release of ChatGPT-3 and the integration with Microsoft, but does not provide any details or analysis on how these events impacted the company's reputation and performance. This makes it seem like a list of unrelated facts rather than a coherent argument.
5. The article ends with a subscription link to the Benzinga Tech Trends newsletter, which is irrelevant and inappropriate for the topic at hand. It does not add any value or information to the reader and seems like an attempt to promote another service instead of delivering quality journalism.