A man named Edward Snowden, who told the world about some secret spying things that a government was doing, is worried about a company called OpenAI. He says they are not being good and are trying to hurt people's privacy. He thinks they made a bad choice by adding a new person to their team who used to be in charge of spying for the government. Snowden tells people not to trust this company or its products that use special talking computer programs like ChatGPT. Read from source...

1. The author of the article seems to have a strong bias against OpenAI and its products, such as ChatGPT. This is evident from the use of sensationalist headlines like "This Is A Calculated Betrayal Of The Rights Of Every Person" and the constant negative framing of OpenAI's actions and decisions throughout the article.
2. The author also relies heavily on a single tweet from a user named @MarioNawfal as the primary source of information for the reader to form an opinion about Paul Nakasone's role in OpenAI. This is not sufficient evidence to support such strong claims and accusations against both OpenAI and Nakasone.
3. The author does not provide any context or background information on who Paul Nakasone is, his credentials, or his previous work experiences. This makes it difficult for the reader to assess whether his involvement with OpenAI poses any real threat to privacy and civil liberties.
4. The author's emotional appeal to the readers by using phrases like "Do not ever trust OpenAI or its products" is irrational and manipulative, as it does not provide any logical arguments or evidence to back up such a statement. It also undermines the credibility of the article and the author as a reliable source of information on this topic.
5. The author fails to mention any potential benefits or positive aspects of OpenAI's products and research, such as their potential for advancing AI technology, improving natural language processing, or enhancing cybersecurity. This creates an imbalanced and one-sided narrative that only focuses on the negative aspects and risks associated with OpenAI.

Possible action:

There are several possible actions that one can take in response to Snowden's warning. Some of them are:

- Sell all OpenAI-related assets, including ChatGPT shares and options, and avoid any future investments in the company or its products. This is a conservative approach that minimizes exposure to potential legal and ethical risks associated with OpenAI's practices and policies. However, it may also result in missing out on possible gains from the company's growth and innovation.
- Hold onto existing OpenAI-related assets, but monitor the situation closely and sell them if any major negative developments or scandals occur. This is a more balanced approach that allows for some exposure to the potential upside of OpenAI's products and services, while also protecting oneself from significant losses in case of reputational damage or legal troubles. However, it requires constant attention and flexibility to react quickly to changing market conditions and news.
- Buy more OpenAI-related assets, especially ChatGPT shares and options, on the assumption that Snowden's warning is exaggerated or misguided, and that OpenAI will continue to succeed and innovate despite the controversy. This is a speculative approach that bets on the company's resilience and potential to overcome the challenges and criticism it faces. However, it also involves a high degree of risk and uncertainty, as well as the possibility of losing money if OpenAI's reputation or business model suffers significant damage or backlash from regulators, customers, or other stakeholders.