Okay, so there's this thing called the stock market where people buy and sell pieces of companies. Sometimes, these pieces are worth more or less than before. Today, we're going to talk about some pieces that were worth more after the market closed on Wednesday and before it opened on Thursday.

There is a company named Robinhood which lets people trade stocks easily. The article says that their pieces are worth 12% more than before, which means they are doing well. It also talks about other companies whose pieces became more valuable or less valuable during the night. Some of these companies are bigger and some are smaller, but all of them have something to do with people trading stocks. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies a causal relationship between Robinhood shares and the other stocks mentioned in the article, when there is no evidence to support this claim. A more accurate title could be "Why Some Stocks Are Trading Higher By Around 12%; Here Are 20 Stocks Moving Premarket".
- The article fails to provide a clear and concise introduction that explains the main purpose and scope of the text. It jumps straight into listing the stocks without giving any context or background information about why they are moving higher or lower in premarket trading. A good introduction should hook the reader's attention, provide some relevant facts or statistics, and state the thesis or main argument of the article.
- The article uses vague and ambiguous terms such as "around 12%" and "premarket". These terms do not convey precise information about the magnitude and timing of the stock movements, which could confuse or mislead readers who are looking for specific data. A more transparent and accurate way to present this information would be to use exact percentages and time frames, such as "12.3% in the last 15 minutes" or "10.3% since midnight".
- The article lacks coherence and structure. It jumps from one stock to another without providing any transitions or connections between them. It also does not explain why certain stocks are moving higher or lower, nor does it provide any analysis or commentary on the factors that influence their performance. A more organized and informative way to present this information would be to group the stocks by sector, industry, or theme, and to provide relevant facts, figures, and quotes from experts or sources that support the claims made in the article.