A company called Nvidia, which makes special chips for computers and AI stuff, did really well in the last three months. They announced their results on Wednesday. One of the digital coins related to this company is called Render, and it was doing well before the announcement because people thought Nvidia would do good. But after the announcement, some people sold their Render coins for money, so the price went down a bit. Some big people who have lots of Render coins moved them to different places, which could mean they are selling them too. So now, Render is not doing as well as before. Read from source...

1. The article is titled "This One Crypto Is Most Associated With NVDA, Here How It's Doing After The Tech Giant's Blockbuster Quarter". However, the crypto discussed in the article is not only associated with NVDA, but also with other AI-based projects and platforms. Therefore, the title is misleading and sensationalized to attract attention.
2. The article claims that Render token was trading 3.79% lower at the time of writing, according to Benzinga Pro data. However, this information is not relevant or helpful for understanding how the crypto is doing after NVDA's earnings announcement. It would be more useful to provide context on how much the token has dropped from its two-month high or how it compares to other cryptos in the same market segment.
3. The article mentions that Render token made gains ahead of the earnings announcement, rising to a two-month high of $11.81. However, it does not explain why this happened or what factors influenced the price movement. It also does not provide any historical data or trends for the token's performance over time.
4. The article states that RNDR's trading volume nearly doubled in the last 24 hours, surpassing meme powerhouse Shiba Inu. However, it does not explain why this occurred or what implications it has for the crypto's adoption and demand. It also compares the token to a completely unrelated asset class (meme coins) that operates on a different logic and market dynamics.
5. The article quotes Santiment, an on-chain analytics firm, that whale engagement with the AI token was rising. However, it does not provide any evidence or details to support this claim. It also implies that whales are selling off their tokens, which contradicts the previous statement about trading volume increasing.
6. The article ends abruptly without providing any conclusion, summary, or outlook for the future of the crypto and its relationship with NVDA. It leaves the reader unsatisfied and confused about the main points and purpose of the article.