So, there is this big company called Microsoft that makes things like Xbox and computers. They want to make a new place where people can buy games online, kind of like what Apple and Google already do with their app stores. But they want to be different by making it work on any device and letting more people use it. This could be a problem for Apple and Google because they charge money for people to use their app stores, and Microsoft's new place might not cost as much. Read from source...

1. The title of the article is misleading and sensationalized. It suggests that Microsoft is directly competing with Apple and Google, while in reality, they are offering a different service (a web-based gaming store) that does not necessarily replace or challenge the existing app stores.
2. The article uses vague terms like "later" and "first step" to describe Microsoft's plans for the web-based gaming store, without providing any concrete timeline or details on how the platform will evolve or expand. This creates a sense of uncertainty and speculation among readers.
3. The article cites an unnamed Xbox spokesperson as the source of information, without mentioning their credentials, role, or affiliation with Microsoft. This lack of transparency and credibility undermines the reliability of the report and raises questions about the motives behind it.
4. The article mentions Apple's and Google's 30% sales fee as a factor that motivates Microsoft to launch its own web-based gaming store, but does not provide any analysis or comparison on how this fee affects the profitability or competitiveness of different game publishers or developers. This oversight leaves readers with an incomplete and superficial understanding of the market dynamics and the challenges that Microsoft faces in entering this space.
5. The article briefly references the European Union's Digital Markets Act, but does not explain how it impacts Microsoft's decision to launch its web-based gaming store or what benefits or drawbacks it entails for the company. This omission creates confusion and leaves readers wondering about the relevance and implications of this legislation.