A man named Ivan Boesky, who was very rich and famous on Wall Street, has died at the age of 87. He became rich by buying and selling stocks in companies that he thought would be taken over by other companies. But he did something wrong - he used secret information to make his trades, which is called insider trading. This got him into big trouble with the law and he had to pay a huge fine. He also helped the authorities catch other people who were doing the same thing as him. Read from source...

- The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that Ivan Boesky was a real-life Gordon Gekko, but in reality, he was only an inspiration for the character and not his alter ego. Moreover, the title suggests that the article is about Boesky's death, but it only mentions it as a fact and does not elaborate on how it affected him or others. A better title would be "The Rise and Fall of Ivan Boesky: Wall Street's Infamous Insider Trader".
- The article provides too much background information on Boesky's life, such as his education, family, and early career. This does not add much value to the reader who is interested in learning about his role in the insider trading scandal and its consequences. A more focused approach would be to start with the discovery of his illegal activities and then explain how he operated and why he was so successful for a while.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms such as "aggressive approach", "unprecedented levels", and "illegal stock tips". These phrases do not clarify what Boesky did or how he violated the law. A more objective and precise language would help the reader understand the complexity of his scheme and its implications for the market and the regulations.
- The article does not provide enough context on the historical and social factors that contributed to the insider trading phenomenon in the 1980s. It mentions the takeover activity and the celebration of wealth, but it does not explore how these factors influenced Boesky's behavior or motivated him to break the law. A more comprehensive analysis would include some examples of the corporate raiders, the institutional investors, and the media that shaped his mindset and actions.
- The article ends abruptly with Boesky's conviction and does not follow up on the aftermath of his downfall or the impact of his case on Wall Street and the regulatory environment. It leaves the reader wondering what happened to him, his family, his associates, and his victims. A more satisfying conclusion would summarize the main lessons learned from his story and how they affected the future of finance and ethics.