Cirrus Logic is a company that makes special parts for things like phones and music players. They had a really good last quarter, so some people who study the stock market think they will do even better in the future. So they changed their predictions about how much money Cirrus Logic might make. This made the value of Cirrus Logic go up by 9.3%. Some experts still say it's a good company to invest in because they expect more good news from them. Read from source...

1. The article title is misleading and sensationalized. It implies that the analysts boosted their forecasts because of the upbeat Q4 results, when in reality they only raised their price targets on Cirrus Logic shares after the earnings announcement. This suggests that the analysts had already formed a positive opinion about the company before the results were released, and the results only confirmed it. Therefore, the title should have been something like "Analysts Raise Price Targets on Cirrus Logic After Positive Q4 Results" or "Cirrus Logic Shares Rise as Analysts Increase Price Targets Following Earnings Announcement".
2. The article does not provide any evidence or reasoning for why the analysts decided to raise their price targets on Cirrus Logic shares. It simply states that they did so, without explaining what factors influenced their decisions or how they arrived at their new target prices. This leaves the reader with a vague and incomplete understanding of the situation and does not help them make informed investment decisions.
3. The article focuses too much on the price targets and the share price movements of Cirrus Logic, rather than on the actual performance and prospects of the company. It mentions that Cirrus Logic is a supplier of mixed-signal chips for smartphones and other devices, but does not provide any details about its products, customers, competitors, or market trends. This makes it difficult for the reader to assess whether Cirrus Logic is actually a good investment opportunity or not.
4. The article cites two analysts from different firms who raised their price targets on Cirrus Logic shares after the earnings announcement. However, it does not mention any other sources of information or opinions that support or contradict these views. This creates a false impression that the analysts' opinions are widely shared and unanimous, when in reality they may be just one among many possible perspectives on the company and its prospects.
5. The article ends with an advertisement for Benzinga's services, which is irrelevant and intrusive to the main topic of the article. It does not add any value or credibility to the content, and may even undermine the reader's trust in the source.