A man named Do Kwon created a thing called Terra that was supposed to help people trade money and cryptocurrencies easily. But it didn't work well, and many people lost lots of money when it failed. Now, he is in trouble with the law and wants more time to prepare for his trial where they will decide if he did something wrong or not. He also doesn't want to be sent to the United States right away because he thinks it would make things harder for him. Read from source...
- The title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Do Kwon asked for a trial extension to delay his extradition to the US. In reality, he simply requested more time to prepare his defense and address legal issues, which is a normal procedure in any court case.
- The article uses vague terms like "pushing back" and "requesting an instruction", without providing specific details or quotes from Kwon's legal team or the judge. This creates confusion and ambiguity for the readers, who might misunderstand the actual situation and motives of the parties involved.
- The article relies heavily on negative associations and emotions, such as referring to the collapse of Terraform's stablecoin and FTX as "disasters" and "crashes", without acknowledging the complex factors and circumstances that led to them. It also mentions millions of dollars lost by investors, but does not mention how much money Kwon or his associates made or lost, or how they contributed to the market turmoil.
- The article implies a causal relationship between Terraform's collapse and FTX's collapse, without providing any evidence or explanation for how or why this happened. It also suggests that Kwon was held responsible for both events, while ignoring other factors such as market conditions, regulations, competition, and human error.
- The article uses biased language and tone, such as calling Kwon "the founder of Terraform" instead of his full name or title, implying that he is the sole leader or representative of the company. It also portrays him as a fugitive who tried to escape using falsified documents, without mentioning the details of his arrest or the reasons for his travel.
- The article fails to provide any balanced or objective perspective on Kwon's case, by not including any quotes or opinions from his legal team, supporters, critics, or experts in the crypto industry. It also does not mention any possible outcomes or implications of his trial or extradition for the future of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology.