A man named Ross Gerber said that many technology companies are spending lots of money on making computers and machines smarter. This is good news for some other companies that make the parts or buildings for these smart computers and machines. He thinks this will help them make more money in the future. Some examples of these companies are Nvidia, Meta, Microsoft, Alphabet, and Dell Technologies. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that only Nvidia, Meta, and some other companies will benefit from AI infrastructure spending, while ignoring the fact that many other players in the industry will also have opportunities to grow and innovate.
- The article relies on Gerber's tweet as a primary source of information, without verifying or questioning his claims or credentials. This is problematic because Gerger has no apparent expertise or background in AI or technology, and his opinion could be based on subjective factors or personal bias.
- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that there is a "surge" in AI-related activities within the tech sector. It simply cites Gerber's tweet as evidence, without examining the validity or reliability of his statement. This is lazy and irresponsible journalism, as it does not inform the reader of the actual trends or developments in the industry.
- The article mentions some companies that have performed well in the AI and cloud computing space, such as Microsoft, Alphabet, Nvidia, etc., but does not explain why they are successful or how they are leveraging AI infrastructure spending. It also does not compare them to their competitors or peers, nor does it consider any potential risks or challenges they may face in the future. This is a superficial and incomplete analysis of the industry dynamics and competition.
- The article ends with a list of related links that are irrelevant or outdated, such as Jim Cramer's comments on Microsoft and Google, Gene Munster's prediction for Google's revenue, and Benzinga's Consumer Tech coverage. These links do not add any value to the article, and may confuse or mislead the reader about the main topic and purpose of the article.

### Final answer: AI criticized the article for being misleading, unreliable, superficial, and incomplete.