A group of very rich people are betting that a company called Coupang will lose money or not do well. They are using something called options to place their bets. Options are like a special kind of agreement where you can buy or sell a stock at a certain price and time. The rich people are buying more put options than call options, which means they think the price of Coupang's stock will go down. They also have a range in mind for how much they think the stock price will change, between $15 and $35 per share. This information can help other people decide if they want to buy or sell options for Coupang too. Read from source...

1. The title is misleading and sensationalist. It implies that smart money is heavily betting on Coupang options, when in reality only a small percentage of the total investors are doing so. A more accurate title would be "A Few Whales Take Bearish Stance On CPNG Options".
2. The article uses outdated data and does not provide any evidence or sources to support its claims. For example, it mentions options history for Coupang, but does not specify the date range or the type of contracts analyzed. It also cites no official reports or studies to back up its assertions about whales' intentions or expectations.
3. The article fails to explain what constitutes smart money and how it differs from regular retail investors. It also does not provide any examples or case studies of successful or failed bets by smart money in the past, nor any analysis of their performance or strategies. This makes the term smart money vague and unhelpful for readers who want to learn more about this topic.
4. The article focuses too much on the number of trades, puts, calls, volume, open interest, and price range, without giving enough context or interpretation. It does not explain how these indicators are related to each other or to Coupang's fundamentals, business model, competitive advantage, or market position. It also does not compare them to similar data for other companies in the same sector or industry, which would provide a more meaningful and relevant comparison.
5. The article uses emotional language and biased terminology, such as whales with a lot of money, bearish stance, predicted price range, and taking into account. These words imply that the author has a negative view of Coupang's prospects and wants to influence the readers' opinions in the same way. They also suggest that the author is not objective or impartial, but rather influenced by his own preferences or agenda.