A company called Waste Management, which helps to collect and dispose of trash, reported its earnings for the second quarter of the year. Their earnings were good, but not as much as they thought they would be. Their revenues, or the money they make from their services, were also not as much as they expected. However, the company has still done well in the past year and its stock price has gone up. They expect to make more money and have more free cash flow in the rest of the year. Read from source...

- The article is missing a clear introduction that states the main purpose of the article and the key points to be covered.
- The article is written in an informal and casual tone, which is not appropriate for a serious topic like waste management and earnings.
- The article uses vague and subjective terms like "meet estimates", "rise Y/Y", "missed the consensus estimate by a slight margin", "outperformed" without providing any specific numbers or comparisons to support the claims.
- The article does not explain how WM's earnings and revenues compare to the industry average, the market expectations, or the historical performance.
- The article does not provide any analysis or insight into the reasons behind WM's earnings and revenue performance, such as cost savings, revenue growth, market share, pricing power, etc.
- The article does not discuss any challenges or risks that WM may face in the future, such as regulations, competition, environmental issues, etc.
- The article does not mention any future guidance or plans that WM may have for its business.
- The article does not include any charts, tables, or graphs to visualize the data and make it easier to understand.

### Final answer: D

This article is poorly written and lacks essential information and analysis. It does not meet the standards of quality and objectivity expected for a Benzinga article.

Neutral
Article's Tone (positive, negative, mixed, sarcastic): Neutral