A long time ago, someone wrote an article about how much money you could make if you invested $1000 in a company called ResMed. This company makes things to help people breathe better when they sleep. The article wants to show how well the company has done over 10 years and how much more money you could have made by investing in it. Read from source...

1. The article begins with a vague statement about how much a stock's price changes over time is important for most investors. This implies that the author is trying to appeal to a general audience without providing any specific or actionable information. The reader might wonder why they should care about this topic and what value it brings them.
2. The article then introduces the concept of FOMO, which is not directly related to ResMed's business or performance. This seems like an attempt to create a sense of urgency and excitement around investing in ResMed, rather than presenting factual evidence or analysis. FOMO is also a psychological phenomenon that might not apply to all investors or situations.
3. The article does not provide any context or background information about ResMed's industry, market share, competitors, or challenges. It jumps straight into the hypothetical scenario of investing $1000 in ResMed 10 years ago, without explaining why this company is worth analyzing or how it has evolved over time.
4. The article uses the term "other" to describe ResMed's products and services, without specifying what they are or how they relate to sleep-disordered breathing. This is vague and uninformative, leaving the reader with more questions than answers.
5. The article ends abruptly with a question that does not have a clear answer or purpose. It asks how much one's investment in ResMed would be worth today, but it does not provide any data, methodology, or assumptions to support this calculation. It also does not address the potential risks, uncertainties, or factors that might affect ResMed's performance and value in the future.