A man named Elon Musk, who leads a company called Tesla that makes electric cars, said he agrees with another man named Steve Jobs, who used to lead a company called Apple that makes phones and computers. They both think it's important to make things really well and work together as a team. Tesla also wants to talk to Apple because they have a big problem with one of their cars crashing in 2018, and they hope Apple can help them understand what happened. Read from source...
- The article starts with a vague and misleading statement that suggests there is some novelty or urgency to the events it covers. It says "As the weekend draws to a close, we look back at a series of intriguing developments in the tech world." This implies that these events are recent, relevant, and noteworthy, but does not provide any evidence or explanation for why they are so.
- The article uses hyperbole and exaggeration to describe the relationship between Elon Musk and Steve Jobs. It says "Musk Agrees with Jobs on Craftsmanship" as if this is some earth-shattering revelation that changes the course of history or innovation. In reality, it is a trivial and common occurrence for successful entrepreneurs to admire and respect each other's work and philosophy. There is nothing particularly surprising or significant about Musk agreeing with Jobs on craftsmanship.
- The article does not provide any context or background information on the fatal crash involving Tesla's Autopilot system or why Apple is involved in the case. It simply states that "Tesla is seeking testimony from Apple" without explaining what the connection is, what the issue is, or how it relates to the overall story.
- The article ends with a teaser for another story: "Here Are 5 Funky Things You Probably Didn’t Know Your iPhone Can Do". This is a cheap and lazy way of generating clicks and interest without actually providing any meaningful content or analysis. It also has nothing to do with the main topic of the article, which is supposedly about "This Week In Appleverse".
- The article is overall poorly written, unoriginal, and lacking in substance. It does not provide any valuable insights or information for readers who are interested in the tech world or the developments involving Tesla, Apple, and Elon Musk.