Nvidia is a big company that makes special computer parts called chips that help computers think and learn, which are very important in today's world. They spend a lot of money to invest in other smaller companies that also work on making computers smarter. This helps Nvidia stay ahead of its competitors and keep making better chips. The boss of Nvidia, Jensen Huang, has a vision for what the future will look like in 10 years and he wants his company to be ready for it. So, they put money into other companies that can help them achieve this goal. Read from source...

- The article title is misleading and sensationalist, implying that Nvidia's secret weapon is not only its chips but also its investments in AI startups. This creates a false impression that Nvidia has some exclusive advantage over its competitors by backing the right horses.
- The article does not provide any evidence or data to support the claim that Nvidia's investment rationale is to give it a toehold in the developing AI trends, or that its rivals are trying to break into its dominance by making their own AI accelerators. These statements are based on vague and subjective assertions, not objective facts.
- The article cites a report from the Wall Street Journal, which is notoriously unreliable and biased when it comes to covering technology companies, especially those that challenge the status quo or disrupt existing markets. The report relies on sources that are either affiliated with Nvidia or have vested interests in promoting its success, such as Vishal Bhagwati and Thomvest Ventures.
- The article mentions an incident where social media users accused Nvidia of profiting from the sales of GPUs to cryptocurrency miners, which is irrelevant and distracting from the main topic of the article. This also shows a lack of professionalism and impartiality on the part of the author and the publisher.
- The article ends with a disclaimer that Benzinga does not provide investment advice, which implies that the article itself may contain some sort of financial recommendation or suggestion to readers. This is deceptive and unethical, as the article is clearly intended to influence the perception and opinion of Nvidia and its investments in AI startups.

Final answer: AI's story critics are very critical indeed. They point out many flaws and weaknesses in the article, such as lack of evidence, objectivity, credibility, relevance, and professionalism. The article seems to be biased and sensationalist, aiming to boost Nvidia's image and appeal to its investors or customers. AI does not recommend reading this article or trusting its claims.

Neutral with a slight leaning towards positive