A company called Apple made a special headset called Vision Pro. It is supposed to let you see and touch things that are not real, kind of like playing in a virtual world. But this headset is very expensive, it costs as much as a small car! Some people think it is not worth the money because other companies make similar products that cost less and work better. Even Mark Zuckerberg, who makes Facebook and another company called Meta, said that his cheaper product, Quest 3, is better for most things. But both he and others agreed that Apple's headset has a very good screen that shows clear pictures. Read from source...

1. The article begins by stating that Apple Vision Pro costs $3,500 and Zuckerberg was not impressed. However, the cost of a product is irrelevant to its quality or value unless it is compared to other products in the same category with similar features and functions. Therefore, mentioning the price as a point of criticism without context is misleading and sensationalist.
2. The article quotes Zuckerberg's statement that Meta's Quest 3 is better than Apple Vision Pro in terms of value and overall product. However, this is a subjective opinion that may not reflect the preferences or needs of other users. Moreover, it does not provide any objective criteria or evidence to support this claim. Therefore, presenting Zuckerberg's opinion as a factual conclusion is unprofessional and inaccurate.
3. The article praises Apple Vision Pro's display resolution, but then contradicts itself by implying that Quest 3 is much better for most purposes. This inconsistency shows a lack of coherence and credibility in the argument. Therefore, using such an inconsistent comparison without clarifying the trade-offs or differences between the products is unfair and misleading.