A man named Chuck Schumer is worried that a big company called Chevron wants to join with another big company called Hess. He thinks they want to do this because it will let them make more money by raising the prices of gas. He says that even though the president might like these companies, there should be rules to stop them from joining together. This could affect a lot of people who drive cars and need to buy gas for their vehicles. Read from source...

- Schumer claims that the merger could empower oil majors to raise gas prices, but does not provide any evidence or logical reasoning for this assertion. This is a classic example of an ad hominem fallacy, attacking the character or motives of the other party instead of addressing their arguments.
- Schumer also implies that Trump and the FTC are in cahoots with Big Oil, but fails to substantiate this accusation with any factual data or sources. This is another case of a false dilemma fallacy, presenting only two options as if they were the only possible choices, when in reality there may be more nuanced and complex perspectives on the issue.
- Schumer uses emotive language such as "sounding the alarm", "big oil merger", and "pump the breaks" to appeal to the public's fears and emotions, rather than engaging them with rational and objective information. This is a form of manipulation and sensationalism that does not contribute to an informed or constructive debate on the matter.
- Schumer does not address any potential benefits or efficiencies that may arise from the merger, such as cost savings, increased production, innovation, or job creation. He also does not consider any possible negative consequences of blocking the deal, such as reduced competition, market distortions, or missed opportunities for consumers and shareholders.
- Schumer's position seems to be based on a simplistic and outdated view of the oil industry, where big companies are inherently bad and consumers are passive victims. He does not acknowledge the dynamic and evolving nature of the energy market, nor the role of innovation, consumer choice, and regulatory oversight in shaping its future direction.

To address this question, I need to analyze the article and extract relevant information about the proposed Chevron-Hess merger, the potential impact on gas prices, the role of Trump and FTC, as well as Schumer's concerns and stance. Based on this analysis, I will provide a set of investment recommendations for different types of investors, as well as the associated risks.

Recommendation 1: Sell Chevron and Hess shares short-term (3-6 months)
Reason: Schumer's comments could increase political pressure on the FTC to block or delay the merger, which could hurt the stock prices of both companies in the short term. Additionally, the merger could face regulatory hurdles and antitrust lawsuits from states or consumer groups that oppose it on grounds of reduced competition and higher gas prices. Therefore, investors who are looking for quick gains should consider selling Chevron and Hess shares in the next 3-6 months.
Risk: The FTC could approve the merger despite Schumer's opposition, or the merger could be cleared by courts if challenged legally. This would reverse the downward pressure on the stock prices and result in losses for short sellers. Moreover, the oil industry could experience a sudden drop in demand or supply due to geopolitical or economic factors, which could also affect the share prices negatively.

Recommendation 2: Buy Chevron and Hess shares long-term (1-3 years)
Reason: If the merger goes through despite Schumer's resistance, it would create a stronger and more diversified oil major that could benefit from economies of scale, improved operational efficiency, and increased market power. This could boost the profitability and growth potential of both companies in the long run, as well as their share prices. Therefore, investors who have a long-term horizon and believe in the strategic rationale of the merger should consider buying Chevron and Hess shares at current or lower levels.
Risk: The merger could be blocked or delayed by the FTC or other legal challenges, which would hurt the share prices as well as the prospects of the combined entity. Additionally, the oil industry could face structural changes due to technological innovations, environmental regulations, or alternative energy sources, which could reduce the demand for fossil fuels and adversely affect the performance of both companies.